Vui lòng dùng định danh này để trích dẫn hoặc liên kết đến tài liệu này: http://thuvienso.bvu.edu.vn/handle/TVDHBRVT/19087
Nhan đề: Factive, Contra-factive and Non-factive Modality Expressions
Tác giả: Ho, Van Han
Từ khoá: Factive
Contra-factive
Non-factive
Proposition
Năm xuất bản: 2018
Nhà xuất bản: IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science
Tùng thư/Số báo cáo: Volume 23, Issue 7, Ver. 1 (July. 2018);pp. 66-69
Tóm tắt: In a state of affair, a speaker typically asserts the (un)truth of a proposition because his volition indicated to mark a presupposition about what he said. What he said is possible for what happens, happened, will happen in real or imaginary world. For this view, the duty of the hearer must consider whether the state of affair is factivity or nonfactivity. Factivity or nonfactivity usually is implied commitment the (un)truth of a proposition or (un)occurrence of an event through modal predicatives. For instance, (1) I know she has arrived. (2) I think she has arrived. The factivity or nonfactivity in (1) and (2) is committed by the modal predicatives ‘know’ and ‘think’. ‘Know’ is considered the strong commitment while ‘think’ is the very weak one of the speaker to the truth of what he said (she has arrived). From this point of view, we first investigate and analyze some of factual and nonfactual modal verbs systematized by Cao Xuan Hao (1999), then we conduct them to see whether they exist in the same way in different types of utterances based on analyzing presupposition and implicature. The results show that there is no complete sustainability of distinction between the word system of factual modality and the word system of nonfactual modality.
Định danh: http://thuvienso.bvu.edu.vn/handle/TVDHBRVT/19087
ISSN: 2279-0837
Bộ sưu tập: Sau Đại học (Articles)

Các tập tin trong tài liệu này:
Tập tin Mô tả Kích thước Định dạng  
Ho-Van-Han-1.pdf163,16 kBAdobe PDFHình minh họa
 Đăng nhập để xem toàn văn


Khi sử dụng các tài liệu trong Thư viện số phải tuân thủ Luật bản quyền.